LINE 2 – Results

LINE 2: Engaging Students and Staff in Jointly Building Student-Centred Higher Education

Line 2 activities carried out by the ACE Units consisted in designing and facilitating sessions for university instructors and students, as well as other relevant stakeholders. These sessions aimed to construct the understanding and develop the skills and competences necessary in order for students and staff to jointly build student-centred higher education, first at the level of a particular degree programme, and later – at the level of a department/faculty and eventually the whole higher education institution. Such sessions were organised around six broad topics:

For each of the topics, the ACE Units had to

(1) make sure they understood the key aspects and concepts well enough to be able to explain these to others,
(2) design the sessions,
(3) run the sessions,
(4) reflect on the lessons learned and use the outputs of the sessions for (a) building a collection of resources anyone interested in replicating such sessions can use and/or (b) revising curricula to make these (more) student-centred

Below, the work done on each of the six topics is presented briefly.

TOPIC 1: What does the Student-Centred Approach imply?

In Topic 1, the ACE Units focused on the concept of student-centred learning – its advantages, the new roles of teachers and students, and the elements that must be present in order to be able to talk about an implementation of the approach – the aspects that need to be revised or created if one wants to adopt this approach in higher education.

More specifically, the ACE Units were to select two out of the following five Goals:

1Explain to university professors, people in administrative positions and students how the adoption of the student-centred approach can benefit students and help higher education institutions to better fulfil their mission and objectives
2Help teachers and students to understand and begin to adopt the new roles they have to play in order to jointly contribute to the successful implementation of the student-centred approach
3Help teachers and students to identify the possible causes of resistance to the implementation of the student-centred approach and to respond appropriately to the behaviours of oneself or others that this feeling of resistance can provoke
4Help university professors prepare a plan for the gradual implementation of the student-centred approach, distinguishing the actions that can be carried out by an individual instructor, on the one hand, and the activities that must be promoted by teams of academics who teach on the same degree programme
5Help students to reflect on the curricular design and implementation of a programme of studies from the point of view of the student-centred approach – so as to share proposals for possible improvements with the teaching team of the degree programme in a feedback session

For the goals selected, the ACE Units first looked for explanatory materials that could help participants of their future sessions understand the key concepts related to student-centred higher education. Next, the ACE Units designed and ran the sessions. Finally, they revised session designs with the aim of making these available to all those interested in conducting similar sessions with their academics and students.

In terms of reaching out beyond the core working groups and involving other academics and students in learning about and jointly discussing programme learning outcomes for a programme on which they teach/which they are enrolled in, a total of 52 sessions were organised by the 21 ACE Units. These sessions engaged as many as 785 participants including students, faculty and administration staff.

Below, some of the products of this work are showcased. These are organised by Goals, with three types of products distinguished: (1) videos that give an overview of sources those interested in preparing a training session on this topic might find useful; (2) training session plans that can be used as such or further adapted; and (3) resources that were created by ACE Units and used as explanatory materials during the training sessions.

GOAL 1: Explain to university professors, people in administrative positions and students how the adoption of the student-centred approach can benefit students and help higher education institutions to better fulfil their mission and objectives

Resources you can consult if you are preparing a training session related to Goal 1:

Ready-to-use training session plans:

Explanatory materials used by ACE Units in their sessions related to Goal 1:

1. Video – “¿Qué es el Enfoque ACE?” (What is the Student-Centred Approach?) [in Spanish] HereUMSA History (Bolivia)
2. Document – “Ventajas del Enfoque ACE” (Advantages of the Student-Centred Approach) [in Spanish]HereUNLA Education (Argentina)
3. Podcasts

Episode 1: “O que ACE tem a ver com voce? (The Student-Centred Approach…What’s in it for you?) [In Portuguese]

Episode 2: “Os principios teóricos y políticos da ACE” (Theoretical and political principles of the Student-Centred Approach) [In Portuguese]

Episode 3: “ACE na prática, funciona?” (In practice, how effective is the Student-Centred Approach?) [In Portuguese]


Here



Here



Here



UNESP Environmental Studies / UNESP Education (Brasil)
4. Explanatory Videos about ACEIntroducción al Enfoque ACE

Pares Dialécticos: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ,7
UNLA Environmental Studies (Argentina)

GOAL 2: Help teachers and students to understand and begin to adopt the new roles they have to play in order to jointly contribute to the successful implementation of the student-centred approach

Resources you can consult if you are preparing a training session related to Goal 2:

Ready-to-use training session plans:

Explanatory materials used by ACE Units in their sessions related to Goal 2:

1. Presentations slides (PDF) – Aprendizaje Centrado en el Estudiante: Sesión de diálogo con estudiantes (Student-Centred Learning: Student workshop) HereUNA Environmental Studies (Paraguay)
2. Video – Nuevos roles de docentes y estudiantes en el Enfoque Centrado en el Estudiante (Student-Centred Learning: New roles of teachers and students) HereUMSS Education (Bolivia)
3. Video – Enfoque Centrado en el Alumno (Student-Centred Learning) HereUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México

GOAL 3: Help teachers and students to identify the possible causes of resistance to the implementation of the student-centred approach and to respond appropriately to the behaviours of oneself or others that this feeling of resistance can provoke

Resources you can consult if you are preparing a training session related to Goal 3:

Ready-to-use training session plans:

Explanatory materials used by ACE Units in their sessions related to Goal 3:

1. Video – Explanatory material used as part of a session related to Goal 3 HereUNCuyo History (Argentina)

GOAL 4: Help university professors prepare a plan for the gradual implementation of the student-centred approach, distinguishing the actions that can be carried out by an individual instructor, on the one hand, and the activities that must be promoted by teams of academics who teach on the same degree programme.

Resources you can consult if you are preparing a training session related to Goal 4:

GOAL 5: Help students to reflect on the curricular design and implementation of a programme of studies from the point of view of the student-centred approach – so as to to share proposals for possible improvements with the teaching team of the degree programme in a feedback session

Resources you can consult if you are preparing a training session related to Goal 5:

TOPIC 2: Writing reliable Programme Learning Outcomes

In Topic 2, the ACE Units focused on expressing the desired graduate profile in terms of programme learning outcomes. The aim was for each ACE Unit to formulate or revise programme learning outcomes for one chosen first-cycle higher education programme in their subject area (History, Education, Environmental Studies, or Nursing) and engage students and academics beyond the ACE Unit in this process.

As a first step, the ACE Units had to choose the first-cycle higher education degree programme they will focus on – the programme they will work with (in Line 2 of the project) and as a result revise (Line 3 of the project).

As a second step, the ACE units had to identify their starting point:

(1) the desired graduate profile has not yet been expressed in terms of programme learning outcomes (there is a general description of the graduate profile, or there is a list of elements/competences, but there is no list of programme learning outcomes that can guide students in their learning, academics in curriculum revision, or graduates and employers when finding a good match between what labour market requires and a graduate has to offer)

(2) the desired graduate profile has been expressed in terms of programme learning outcomes (PLOs), but it has not been recently revised/there are no provisions in place for revising the PLOs (and the graduate profile as such) on a regular basis

(3) the desired graduate profile has been expressed in terms of programme learning outcomes (PLOs) and there are provisions in place to revise the PLOs (and the graduate profile) on a regular basis, but there is a need to conduct such revision in a mixed team – a team built of both students and academics, paying attention to stakeholders’ estimations about whether the current programme effectively leads to the intended PLOs or they are set at an unrealistic level

(4) the desired graduate profile has been expressed in terms of programme learning outcomes (PLOs) and there are provisions in place to revise the PLOs (and the graduate profile) on a regular basis; course learning outcomes (CLOs) have also been formulated; the focus in revising PLOs will be on (1) mapping CLOs against PLOs to identify further needs to curriculum enhancement and (2) on contrasting PLOs with the Subject-Specific Regional Reference Framework developed in Line 1 of the project.

These four options allowed ACE Units to set a reasonable ‘challenge’ for themselves and others in their programme when working on Topic 2.

The third step for all ACE Units consisted in making sure that all ACE Unit members (both academics and students) were ready to help other students and academics engage in the task of formulating or revising PLOs. The ACE Units worked in collaborative manner to co-construct the necessary knowledge and understanding, using the following guiding questions (the questions to focus on depended on the starting point):

1) What are learning outcomes?
2) Why do we need PLOs if we aim to implement a student-centred approach?
3) What do we need to pay attention to in order to write relevant and well-formulated learning outcomes?
4) Why is it important to periodically review the relevance, feasibility and actual achievement of PLOs (in student-centred higher education)?
5) How can we check and ensure the relevance of PLOs we have (also at the regional level – in South America)?
6) How can we analyse the feasibility of proposed PLOs?

7) How can we find out if students actually achieve the intended PLOs?
8) What is the ACE Subject-Specific Regional Reference Framework and how can it be used to revise and ensure the relevance of proposed PLO at regional level?

Besides, each ACE Unit was invited to share sample not-so-well formulated PLOs (their own, or those from other programmes), with comments on why these require revision and improvement suggestions.

Again, as for Topic 1, responses constructed at local level and useful explanatory materials were shared via online forums among all the ACE Units, to facilitate peer-learning.

After this ‘knowledge co-construction phase’, ACE Units decided on how they were going to work on their task of formulating/revising PLOs and at what point and how they were going to engage other students and academics from their programmes in this process.

The programme learning outcomes formulated/revised as a result of this work were then peer-reviewed among the ACE Units of the same subject area, revised and peer-reviewed again by EU academics, and once again peer-reviewed in a face-to-face project meeting. After this, they were included into the Line 3 “Model Curriculum”documents of the respective ACE Units and can be consulted at Line 3 Results page.

In terms of reaching out beyond the core working groups and involving other academics and students in learning about and jointly discussing programme learning outcomes for a programme on which they teach/which they are enrolled in, the total of 27 sessions were organised by the 21 ACE Units. These sessions engaged as many as 649 participants including students, faculty and administration staff.

Below, some of the products of the Line 2 Topic 2 work are showcased. These are grouped into three categories: (1) training sessions’ plans that can be used as such or further adapted; (2) resources that were created or curated by ACE Units and used as explanatory materials during the training sessions; and (3) other resources you can consult if you want to learn more about learning outcomes.

Training sessions’ plans that can be used as such or further adapted:

ACE UFRGS Nursing (Brazil)ACE UNCuyo History (Argentina)
ACE UMSA History (Bolivia)ACE UNESP Environmental Studies (Brazil)
ACE UMSS Education (Bolivia)ACE UNIBE Nursing (Paraguay)
ACE UMSS Nursing (Bolivia) ACE UNILIBRE Environmental Studies (Colombia)
ACE UNA History (Paraguay)ACE UNISABANA Nursing (Colombia)
ACE UNA Environmental Studies (Paraguay)ACE UNLA Environmental Studies (Argentina)
ACE UNCuyo Education (Argentina)ACE UNMSM Environmental Studies (Peru)

Resources created or curated by ACE Units and used as explanatory materials during the training sessions:

Infographic about learning outcomesHereACE UNILIBRE Education (Colombia)
Summary document on learning outcomesHereACE UNLA Education (Argentina)
Explanatory videos (In Spanish):
– “¿Qué son los resultados de aprendizaje? (RRAA)”
– “¿Por qué es necesario formular los RRAA a nivel de la carrera si se quiere llegar a hacer realidad el Enfoque centrado en el Estudiante?”
-“¿Cómo redactar resultados de aprendizaje?”

Here


Here

Here


ACE UMSA Education (Bolivia)
“Como os resultados de aprendizagem possibilitam a prática profissional enfermeiro?” (In Portuguese)
-Explanatory material
-Supporting material



Here
Here


ACE UFRGS Nursing (Brazil)
Podcast “ Resultados de aprendizagem” (In Portuguese)HereACE UNESP Environmental Studies (Brazil)
PPT “Construcción de Resultados de Aprendizaje”HereACE UNA Environmental Studies (Paraguay)
Infographic about writing/revising learning outcomesHereACE UNCuyo History (Argentina)
Infographic about writing learning outcomes
Summary document on learning outcomes
Video – “Resultados de Aprendizaje: Caminando hacia el Enfoque Centrado en el Estudiante” (In Spanish)
Here
Here

Here


ACE UMSS Education (Bolivia)
Videos (In Spanish):
-“Resultados de aprendizaje y objeto de evaluación”
-“Cómo redactar un resultado de aprendizaje”

Here

Here

Curated by ACE UCSA Environmental Studies (Paraguay)
Explanatory video on learning outcomes
PPT “Los resultados de aprendizaje del plan de estudios de ingeniería ambiental bajo el enfoque ACE”
Here

Here

ACE UNILIBRE Environmental Studies (Colombia)

Other resources you can consult if you want to learn more about learning outcomes:

  • Anahí Mastache (2007) Formar personas competentes. Noveduc libros: Buenos Aires
  • Antoni Zabala y Laia Arnau (2007) 11 ideas clave: Cómo aprender y enseñar competencias. Grao: Barcelona.
  • Ballesteros Ballesteros, Vladimir Alfonso. (2020). Una aproximación inicial a los resultados de aprendizaje en educación superior. Revista científica, (39), 259-261.
  • Fontalvo, Tomás J., Delahoz-Dominguez, Enrique J., & De la Hoz, Gustavo. (2022). Resultados de aprendizaje y mecanismos de evaluación en los programas académicos de educación superior en Colombia. Formación universitaria, 15(1), 105-114.
  • Kennedy, & Grof Reese, H. (2007). Redactar y utilizar resultados de aprendizaje : un manual práctico. Ministerio de Educación.
  • María Victoria de la Fuente Aragón et al (2014) La relación de los resultados del aprendizaje, la metodología docente y la metodología de evaluación. En: El reconocimiento docente. Innovar e investigar con criterios de calidad: XII Jornadas de redes de investigación en docencia universitaria / coord. por María Teresa Tortosa Ybáñez, José Daniel Álvarez Teruel, Neus Pellín Buades, 2014, ISBN 978-84-697-0709-8, págs. 1862-1876
  • Philippe Perrenoud (2008) La universidad entre la transmisión de conocimientos y el desarrollo de competencias. En: El debate sobre las competencias en la enseñanza universitaria / coord. por Josep Carreras Barnés, Philippe Perrenoud, 2008, ISBN 978-84-8063-935-4, págs. 21-44
  • Unidad Curricular de Postgrado de la Universidad de la Frontera (2016). Cómo redactar resultados de aprendizaje. https://eservicioseducativos.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Como-redactar-Resultados-de-Aprendizaje-2018.pdf
  • Unidad de Mejoramiento de la Docencia Universitaria de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (sf) Definiendo Resultados de Aprendizaje y Criterios de Evaluación para mis Cursos. https://eservicioseducativos.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Criterios-de-evaluacio%CC%81n.pdf
  • Universidad del Desarrollo (sf) Guía para redactar Resultados de Aprendizaje. https://cdd.udd.cl/files/2018/11/Guia_para_Redactar_Resultados_de_Aprendizaje.pdf

TOPIC 3: The application of credits in degree programmes

In Topic 3, the ACE Units engaged academics and students from their programmes in estimating and discussing the full student workload of programme courses and periods of learning. Three concrete exercises were to be done by each ACE Unit:

(1) desk estimation of full student workload for each course in the chosen programme – done by academics (described in detail here (in Spanish));
(2) comparing academics’ estimation with students’ estimations – for the full student workload of first-year courses (described in detail here (in Spanish)); and
(3) comparing academics’ planning with the time students actually spent on learning outside the contact hours during a 3-week period (described in detail here (in Spanish))

The first exercise implied engaging all academics of a programme in discussing the notion of student workload and the need for considering the full student workload. The second exercise invited ACE Units to introduce second-year undergraduate students to the notion of full student workload. The third exercise meant that ACE Unit academics will have dialogues about planned versus actual student workload with students they teach.

The results were of three types:

1) Section IV of the Model Curricula is based on the lessons learned thanks to conducting the three exercises (see Line 3 results section);
2) all the ACE Units have tried out three different tools that can be used to better estimate full student workload;
3) students and academics of all the ACE programmes have had first structured dialogues about the full student workload

In terms of the skills acquired, the ACE Units can be expected to have achieved the following learning outcomes:

  1. To explain – to other academics – why it is important to estimate the full student workload if one wants to implement student centred approach
  2. Explain to other academics – the benefits of including in the programme documents the information about the equivalence of full student workload in CLAR credits
  3. Identify effective ways for engaging students in an individual and group reflection on full student workload (in the context of a particular higher education institution and a concrete programme of studies)
  4. Engage academics in a group reflection about the full student workload and the best ways to contrast the planned student workload with the actual student workload (in the context of a particular higher education institution and a concrete programme of studies)
  5. Engage students in joint efforts to estimate more accurately the full student workload of a particular course within a programme of studies

For all those interested in achieving similar outcomes at the level of a course/programme/higher education institution, the full task descriptions, along with respective ‘product presentation templates’, are shared below (in Spanish):

  1. Desk estimation of full student workload for each course in a programme of studies
  2. Comparing academics’ estimation of full student workload with students’ estimations at the level of particular programme courses
  3. Diary/Logbook exercise to share the planning and obtain feedback on student workload associated with learning activities outside of the classroom

TOPIC 4: Writing reliable Unit/Course Learning Outcomes

In Topic 4, the ACE Units focused on writing or revising course learning outcomes (CLOs) and making sure these were aligned with the programme learning outcomes (cf. outputs of Topic 2 work). All ACE Units were invited to start this work with CLOs of first-year courses, and then gradually move onwards during the remaining months of the project. Again, the ACE Units sought for contextually-appropriate ways to engage students and academics from beyond the ACE Units in this process. The outputs of this work can be consulted in the Model Curricula documents (see Results of Line 3).

Another important challenge addressed in Topic 4 activities was that of making sure students are aware of the learning outcomes of the courses they follow and understand these. Here, ACE Units were invited to select (at least) one of the first-year courses for which CLOs have been revised/formulated, and prepare a video that could be used with prospective students to help them understand what they were expected to learn, and how these CLOs were related to the PLOs and/or the CLOs of follow-up courses and/or intended professional occupation. Some ACE Units (e.g. UMSS Nursing ACE Unit (Bolivia) UCSA Environmental Studies ACE Unit (Paraguay) and UNILIBRE Education ACE Unit (Colombia)), actually organised meetings with students to discuss the meaning and the relevance of CLOs of particular courses.

In terms of reaching out beyond the core working groups and involving other academics and students in learning about and jointly discussing programme learning outcomes for a programme on which they teach/which they are enrolled in, a total of 30 sessions were organised by the 21 ACE Units. These sessions engaged as many as 214 participants including students, faculty and administration staff.

Below are the first attempts of ACE Units to accomplish the task of explaining CLOs – their relevance and meaning – to future first-year students. These are organised by Subject Area. We are sharing them with the purpose of inspiring academics to look for hints about how best to communicate with students about CLOs.

EducationHistory
UNLA – Argentina
UNCuyo – Argentina
UMSA – Bolivia
UMSS – Bolivia
UNA – Paraguay
UNCuyo – Argentina
UMSA – Bolivia
Environmental StudiesNursing
UNESP – Brasil
UNMSM – Perú
UNA – Paraguay
UNI – Perú (1 & 2)
UNLA – Argentina (1 & 2)
UNILIBRE – Colombia (1 & 2)
UNISABANA – Colombia
UFRGS – Brasil
UNIBE – Paraguay (1, 2 & 3)
UMSS – Bolivia

TOPIC 5: Applying the Student-Centred Approach in Teaching and Learning

In Topic 5, ACE Units were invited to design and run sessions for academics or academics and students focused on the broad aim of motivating academics to ground their choices of learning and teaching activities (more explicitly) on what is known about how humans learn. The sessions could also do this through show-casing how this is already done by some/all of the academics invited to take part in these workshops.

In terms of reaching out beyond the core working groups and involving other academics and students, a total of 26 sessions engaging as many as 556 participants were organised by the 21 ACE Units.

Below three categories of resources useful for others who wish to organise similar sessions are shared: (1) ready-to-use or -adapt session designs, (2) explanatory materials created by ACE Units for session-facilitation purposes, and (3) materials created by actors beyond the ACE project and curated by ACE Units for the purposes of facilitating Topic 5-related sessions.

Sessions designs to be used or adapted:

Topic 5 related materials created by ACE Units:

Topic 5 related materials created by others and used by ACE Units:

TOPIC 6: Applying the Student-Centred Approach in Assessment

In Topic 6, the ACE Units designed and facilitated sessions for academics or for academics and students to discuss various aspects, key principles or best practices in relation to Assessment in the Student-Centered Approach.

In terms of reaching beyond the core working groups and involving other academics and students, the 21 ACE Units have organized between 1 and 2 sessions per ACE Unit and have managed to involve more than 390 people beyond the student and faculty members of the ACE Units.

Below three categories of resources useful for others who wish to organise similar sessions are shared: (1) ready-to-use or -adapt session designs, (2) explanatory/support materials that can be used in such sessions, and (3) other resourses that can be consulted to learn ore about Student-Centred Assessment.

Sessions designs to be used or adapted (in Spanish/Portuguese):

Explanatory and/or Supporting materials

Other resourses that can be consulted to learn ore about Student-Centred Assessment:

  • Tobón Tobón, S.; Pimienta Prieto, J. H. y J. Antonio García Fraile. (2010). Secuencias didácticas: aprendizaje y evaluación de competencias. PEARSON EDUCACIÓN, México.
  • Taboada, María Beatriz. (2021). Secuencias didácticas: 30 preguntas y respuestas. El Ateneo. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires.